rustio rustio.net

access_log_parser vs cw_parser vs clap_derive

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

access_log_parsercw_parserclap_derive
Health Score444179
Total Downloads23.6K6.1K445.8M
30d Downloads9922435.1M
Dependents413.1K
Releases10489
Last Updated424d ago1606d ago15d ago
Age6y 11m4y 4m5y 10m

Health Breakdown

access_log_parser
Maintenance
8
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
cw_parser
Maintenance
9
Quality
14
Community
4
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
clap_derive
Maintenance
18
Quality
21
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

access_log_parsercw_parserclap_derive
Version0.11.00.1.34.6.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseApache-2.0MITMIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies576
Crate Size20KB4KB33KB
Features006
Yanked %0.0%0.0%1.1%
Edition201820182024
MSRV1.85
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • clap_derive leads with a health score of 79/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • clap_derive is depended on by 3.1K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ access_log_parser, cw_parser have not been updated in over a year.
  • access_log_parser, cw_parser are pre-1.0 — API may change.