rustio rustio.net

access_log_parser vs cw_parser vs clap_derive

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

access_log_parsercw_parserclap_derive
Health Score454175
Total Downloads26.6K6.2K623.4M
30d Downloads0031.3M
Dependents1013.2K
Releases10490
Last Updated532d ago1714d ago89d ago
Age7y 2m4y 8m6y 2m

Health Breakdown

access_log_parser
Maintenance
8
Quality
14
Community
9
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
cw_parser
Maintenance
9
Quality
14
Community
4
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
clap_derive
Maintenance
14
Quality
21
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

access_log_parsercw_parserclap_derive
Version0.11.00.1.34.6.1
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseApache-2.0MITMIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies576
Crate Size20KB4KB34KB
Features006
Yanked %0.0%0.0%1.1%
Edition201820182024
MSRV1.85
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • clap_derive leads with a health score of 75/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • clap_derive is depended on by 3.2K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ access_log_parser, cw_parser have not been updated in over a year.
  • access_log_parser, cw_parser are pre-1.0 — API may change.