Decision Workspace
arcanum-signatures vs signatory vs jubjub-schnorr
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
47
arcanum-signatures
experimentalv0.1.2
Digital signature algorithms for the Arcanum cryptographic engine
56
signatory
growingv0.27.1
Multi-provider elliptic curve digital signature library with ECDSA and Ed25519 support
55
jubjub-schnorr
growingv0.6.0
A pure-Rust implementation of Schnorr signatures with a PLONK circuit module additionally
Core Metrics
| arcanum-signatures | signatory | jubjub-schnorr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 47 | 56 | 55 |
| Total Downloads | 684 | 23.6M | 31.8K |
| 30d Downloads | 320 | 5.5M | 4.6K |
| Dependents | 11 | 259 | 55 |
| Releases | 3 | 57 | 10 |
| Last Updated | 60d ago | 956d ago | 49d ago |
| Age | 2m | 8y 2m | 2y 2m |
Health Breakdown
arcanum-signatures
Maintenance
10
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
3
Documentation
12
signatory
Maintenance
7
Quality
14
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
jubjub-schnorr
Maintenance
15
Quality
14
Community
11
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| arcanum-signatures | signatory | jubjub-schnorr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.2 | 0.27.1 | 0.6.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 OR MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 21 | 10 | 17 |
| Crate Size | 34KB | 126KB | 27KB |
| Features | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | 1.89 | 1.65 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •signatory leads with a health score of 56/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •signatory is depended on by 259 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ signatory has not been updated in over a year.