rustio rustio.net

associative-cache vs cached vs lru

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

associative-cachecachedlru
Health Score637369
Total Downloads2.2M38.6M278.4M
30d Downloads117.5K1.1M15.7M
Dependents224.0K22.1K
Releases510472
Last Updated84d ago1d ago4d ago
Age6y 10m9y 3m9y 6m

Health Breakdown

associative-cache
Maintenance
11
Quality
20
Community
10
Popularity
8
Documentation
14
cached
Maintenance
19
Quality
16
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
lru
Maintenance
20
Quality
14
Community
14
Popularity
8
Documentation
13

Technical Details

associative-cachecachedlru
Version3.0.12.0.20.18.1
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MITMIT
Dependencies1233
Crate Size21KB317KB19KB
Features0152
Yanked %0.0%1.0%8.3%
Edition20182024
MSRV1.651.851.85.0
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • cached leads with a health score of 73/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • lru has the most downloads (278.4M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • lru is depended on by 22.1K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • lru is pre-1.0 — API may change.