rustio rustio.net

atomic-interval vs clocksource vs cache-padded

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

atomic-intervalclocksourcecache-padded
Health Score366462
Total Downloads17.4K15.3M24.8M
30d Downloads55797.7K336.1K
Dependents089245
Releases5175
Last Updated771d ago7d ago1051d ago
Age4y 4m9y 7m5y 10m

Health Breakdown

atomic-interval
Maintenance
4
Quality
14
Community
3
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
clocksource
Maintenance
16
Quality
13
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
cache-padded
Maintenance
4
Quality
21
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
11

Technical Details

atomic-intervalclocksourcecache-padded
Version0.1.41.0.01.3.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✓ Yes
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies430
Crate Size12KB22KB9KB
Features000
Yanked %0.0%5.9%0.0%
Edition202120242018
MSRV1.851.31
Owners13 (team)2 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • clocksource leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • cache-padded has the most downloads (24.8M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • cache-padded is depended on by 245 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ atomic-interval, cache-padded have not been updated in over a year.
  • atomic-interval is pre-1.0 — API may change.