rustio rustio.net

atomic-take vs orx-concurrent-option vs cache-padded

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

atomic-takeorx-concurrent-optioncache-padded
Health Score545562
Total Downloads9.4M80.8K24.8M
30d Downloads502.3K13.9K336.1K
Dependents22926245
Releases365
Last Updated1154d ago350d ago1051d ago
Age6y 5m1y 7m5y 10m

Health Breakdown

atomic-take
Maintenance
3
Quality
20
Community
12
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
orx-concurrent-option
Maintenance
9
Quality
20
Community
10
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
cache-padded
Maintenance
4
Quality
21
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
11

Technical Details

atomic-takeorx-concurrent-optioncache-padded
Version1.1.01.5.01.3.0
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✓ Yes✓ Yes
LicenseMITMIT OR Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies110
Crate Size6KB29KB9KB
Features010
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition201820242018
MSRV1.48.01.31
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • cache-padded leads with a health score of 62/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • cache-padded is depended on by 245 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ atomic-take, cache-padded have not been updated in over a year.