Decision Workspace
axicor-compute vs cudarc vs burn-cuda
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
51
axicor-compute
experimentalv0.1.0
Axicor SNN engine — dual-backend (CUDA / AMD HIP) GPU compute kernels with CPU fallback
69
cudarc
growingv0.19.7
Safe and minimal CUDA bindings
68
burn-cuda
growingv0.21.0
CUDA backend for the Burn framework
Core Metrics
| axicor-compute | cudarc | burn-cuda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 51 | 69 | 68 |
| Total Downloads | 61 | 4.5M | 584.5K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 868.4K | 90.9K |
| Dependents | 4 | 1.9K | 263 |
| Releases | 2 | 86 | 23 |
| Last Updated | 31d ago | 10d ago | 18d ago |
| Age | 1m | 3y 8m | 1y 9m |
Health Breakdown
axicor-compute
Maintenance
12
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
cudarc
Maintenance
18
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
burn-cuda
Maintenance
19
Quality
17
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| axicor-compute | cudarc | burn-cuda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0 | 0.19.7 | 0.21.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Crate Size | 53KB | 555KB | 30KB |
| Features | 2 | 67 | 8 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.75 | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •cudarc leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •cudarc is depended on by 1.9K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.