rustio rustio.net

axum-conditional-requests vs axum-response-cache vs axum-reverse-proxy

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

axum-conditional-requestsaxum-response-cacheaxum-reverse-proxy
Health Score495061
Total Downloads392109.7K93.6K
30d Downloads269.1K24.3K
Dependents019
Releases3618
Last Updated2d ago238d ago41d ago
Age6m1y 5m1y 3m

Health Breakdown

axum-conditional-requests
Maintenance
19
Quality
14
Community
3
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
axum-response-cache
Maintenance
12
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
axum-reverse-proxy
Maintenance
16
Quality
17
Community
9
Popularity
6
Documentation
13

Technical Details

axum-conditional-requestsaxum-response-cacheaxum-reverse-proxy
Version0.1.20.4.01.1.2
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseMITMITMIT
Dependencies41229
Crate Size5KB17KB84KB
Features135
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420212024
MSRV
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • axum-reverse-proxy leads with a health score of 61/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • axum-response-cache has the most downloads (109.7K), suggesting wider adoption.
  • axum-conditional-requests, axum-response-cache are pre-1.0 — API may change.