Decision Workspace
bitmap-allocator vs talc vs esp-alloc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
52
bitmap-allocator
growingv0.2.1
Bit allocator based on segment tree algorithm.
71
talc
stablev5.0.3
A fast and flexible allocator for no_std and WebAssembly
66
esp-alloc
growingv0.9.0
A heap allocator for Espressif devices
Core Metrics
| bitmap-allocator | talc | esp-alloc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 52 | 71 | 66 |
| Total Downloads | 80.3K | 521.6K | 633.9K |
| 30d Downloads | 5.7K | 75.0K | 32.4K |
| Dependents | 2 | 128 | 128 |
| Releases | 3 | 27 | 10 |
| Last Updated | 197d ago | 2d ago | 165d ago |
| Age | 1y 8m | 2y 8m | 3y 8m |
Health Breakdown
bitmap-allocator
Maintenance
9
Quality
15
Community
12
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
talc
Maintenance
19
Quality
21
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
esp-alloc
Maintenance
10
Quality
17
Community
17
Popularity
7
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| bitmap-allocator | talc | esp-alloc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.2.1 | 5.0.3 | 0.9.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| Crate Size | 6KB | 66KB | 16KB |
| Features | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 3.7% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.64.0 | 1.86.0 |
| Owners | 3 (team) | 1 | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •talc leads with a health score of 71/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •esp-alloc has the most downloads (633.9K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •talc is depended on by 128 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •bitmap-allocator, esp-alloc are pre-1.0 — API may change.