Decision Workspace
bitmap-allocator vs talc vs esp-alloc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
58
bitmap-allocator
growingv0.4.6
Bit allocator based on segment tree algorithm.
69
talc
stablev5.0.4
A fast and flexible allocator for no_std and WebAssembly
68
esp-alloc
growingv0.10.0
A heap allocator for Espressif devices
Core Metrics
| bitmap-allocator | talc | esp-alloc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 58 | 69 | 68 |
| Total Downloads | 106.6K | 1.0M | 773.1K |
| 30d Downloads | 8.0K | 118.4K | 21.5K |
| Dependents | 13 | 176 | 177 |
| Releases | 8 | 28 | 11 |
| Last Updated | 40d ago | 25d ago | 88d ago |
| Age | 1y 12m | 2y 11m | 3y 11m |
Health Breakdown
bitmap-allocator
Maintenance
17
Quality
11
Community
14
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
talc
Maintenance
17
Quality
21
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
esp-alloc
Maintenance
12
Quality
17
Community
17
Popularity
7
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| bitmap-allocator | talc | esp-alloc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.4.6 | 5.0.4 | 0.10.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| Crate Size | 11KB | 74KB | 17KB |
| Features | 0 | 5 | 16 |
| Yanked % | 12.5% | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.64.0 | 1.88.0 |
| Owners | 3 (team) | 1 | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •talc leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •esp-alloc is depended on by 177 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •bitmap-allocator, esp-alloc are pre-1.0 — API may change.