Decision Workspace
borromean vs sequential-storage vs ekv
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
34
borromean
growingv0.1.0
Efficient multi-collection storage for flash devices.
67
sequential-storage
stablev7.2.0
A crate for storing data in flash with minimal erase cycles.
51
ekv
growingv1.0.0
Key-value database for embedded systems, for raw NOR flash, using an LSM-Tree
Core Metrics
| borromean | sequential-storage | ekv | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 34 | 67 | 51 |
| Total Downloads | 1.6K | 406.9K | 5.7K |
| 30d Downloads | 3 | 44.1K | 352 |
| Dependents | 0 | 73 | 3 |
| Releases | 1 | 35 | 2 |
| Last Updated | 726d ago | 3d ago | 500d ago |
| Age | 1y 12m | 3y 2m | 3y 6m |
Health Breakdown
borromean
Maintenance
1
Quality
16
Community
3
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
sequential-storage
Maintenance
19
Quality
21
Community
8
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
ekv
Maintenance
5
Quality
21
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| borromean | sequential-storage | ekv | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0 | 7.2.0 | 1.0.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 0 | 14 | 10 |
| Crate Size | 2KB | 68KB | 65KB |
| Features | 0 | 9 | 136 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | 1.87 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •sequential-storage leads with a health score of 67/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •⚠ borromean, ekv have not been updated in over a year.
- •borromean is pre-1.0 — API may change.