Decision Workspace
bt_file_cache vs apalis-file-storage vs pi_store
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
48
bt_file_cache
experimentalv0.1.8
A caching mechanism for downloading and storing files from URLs
60
apalis-file-storage
experimentalv0.1.0-rc.7
A test-friendly single process file-based storage backend for apalis
54
pi_store
growingv0.9.8
File storage
Core Metrics
| bt_file_cache | apalis-file-storage | pi_store | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 48 | 60 | 54 |
| Total Downloads | 442 | 691 | 33.3K |
| 30d Downloads | 47 | 205 | 161 |
| Dependents | 3 | 5 | 103 |
| Releases | 9 | 7 | 40 |
| Last Updated | 122d ago | 2d ago | 1d ago |
| Age | 4m | 3m | 2y 7m |
Health Breakdown
bt_file_cache
Maintenance
14
Quality
13
Community
8
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
apalis-file-storage
Maintenance
22
Quality
12
Community
8
Popularity
3
Documentation
15
pi_store
Maintenance
19
Quality
10
Community
10
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| bt_file_cache | apalis-file-storage | pi_store | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.8 | 0.1.0-rc.7 | 0.9.8 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 7 | 9 | 26 |
| Crate Size | 21KB | 13KB | 137KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | 1.85 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •apalis-file-storage leads with a health score of 60/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •pi_store has the most downloads (33.3K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •pi_store is depended on by 103 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.