Decision Workspace
bt_file_cache vs oxidite-storage vs apalis-file-storage
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
46
bt_file_cache
experimentalv0.1.8
A caching mechanism for downloading and storing files from URLs
58
oxidite-storage
experimentalv2.2.1
File storage for Oxidite with local and S3 backends
58
apalis-file-storage
experimentalv0.1.0-rc.9
A test-friendly single process file-based storage backend for apalis
Core Metrics
| bt_file_cache | oxidite-storage | apalis-file-storage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 46 | 58 | 58 |
| Total Downloads | 506 | 303 | 1.2K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dependents | 3 | 15 | 7 |
| Releases | 9 | 6 | 9 |
| Last Updated | 181d ago | 8d ago | 19d ago |
| Age | 6m | 5m | 5m |
Health Breakdown
bt_file_cache
Maintenance
12
Quality
13
Community
8
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
oxidite-storage
Maintenance
19
Quality
17
Community
9
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
apalis-file-storage
Maintenance
19
Quality
12
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| bt_file_cache | oxidite-storage | apalis-file-storage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.8 | 2.2.1 | 0.1.0-rc.9 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 7 | 9 | 9 |
| Crate Size | 21KB | 23KB | 13KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | — | 1.85 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •oxidite-storage leads with a health score of 58/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •apalis-file-storage has the most downloads (1.2K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •bt_file_cache, apalis-file-storage are pre-1.0 — API may change.