rustio rustio.net

bt_file_utils vs async-fs vs async_file

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

bt_file_utilsasync-fsasync_file
Health Score526951
Total Downloads2.9K37.1M1.3K
30d Downloads832.6M169
Dependents151.0K2
Releases5184
Last Updated60d ago194d ago97d ago
Age1y 1m6y 10m9m

Health Breakdown

bt_file_utils
Maintenance
15
Quality
15
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
async-fs
Maintenance
8
Quality
19
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
async_file
Maintenance
16
Quality
12
Community
7
Popularity
4
Documentation
12

Technical Details

bt_file_utilsasync-fsasync_file
Version0.2.02.2.00.1.3
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseGPL-3.0-onlyApache-2.0 OR MITMIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies3510
Crate Size9KB19KB115KB
Features001
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420212024
MSRV1.711.85.1
Owners11 (team)1

Quick Verdict

  • async-fs leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-fs is depended on by 1.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • bt_file_utils, async_file are pre-1.0 — API may change.