rustio rustio.net

bt_file_utils vs async-fs vs read_range

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

bt_file_utilsasync-fsread_range
Health Score576850
Total Downloads3.1K42.6M2.8K
30d Downloads02.9M0
Dependents211.2K0
Releases7188
Last Updated6d ago253d ago203d ago
Age1y 3m7y7m

Health Breakdown

bt_file_utils
Maintenance
19
Quality
15
Community
9
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
async-fs
Maintenance
7
Quality
19
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
read_range
Maintenance
11
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
13

Technical Details

bt_file_utilsasync-fsread_range
Version0.2.22.2.00.2.1
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseGPL-3.0-onlyApache-2.0 OR MITMIT
Dependencies353
Crate Size10KB19KB10KB
Features002
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420212024
MSRV1.71
Owners11 (team)1

Quick Verdict

  • async-fs leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-fs is depended on by 1.2K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • bt_file_utils, read_range are pre-1.0 — API may change.