rustio rustio.net

cache-padded vs genswap vs crossbeam-utils

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

cache-paddedgenswapcrossbeam-utils
Health Score624560
Total Downloads24.8M200574.6M
30d Downloads343.4K5738.7M
Dependents24505.9K
Releases5142
Last Updated1051d ago68d ago467d ago
Age5y 10m2m8y 7m

Health Breakdown

cache-padded
Maintenance
4
Quality
21
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
genswap
Maintenance
9
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
crossbeam-utils
Maintenance
8
Quality
12
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

cache-paddedgenswapcrossbeam-utils
Version1.3.00.1.00.8.21
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✗ No✗ No
LicenseApache-2.0 OR MITMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies032
Crate Size9KB23KB43KB
Features003
Yanked %0.0%0.0%21.4%
Edition201820212021
MSRV1.311.60
Owners2 (team)14 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • cache-padded leads with a health score of 62/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • crossbeam-utils has the most downloads (574.6M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • crossbeam-utils is depended on by 5.9K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ cache-padded, crossbeam-utils have not been updated in over a year.
  • genswap, crossbeam-utils are pre-1.0 — API may change.