rustio rustio.net

cached-path vs axum-response-cache vs fopro

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

cached-pathaxum-response-cachefopro
Health Score535549
Total Downloads1.4M140.4K9.3K
30d Downloads16.8K3.5K0
Dependents23010
Releases24710
Last Updated131d ago35d ago638d ago
Age6y 6m1y 9m1y 9m

Health Breakdown

cached-path
Maintenance
12
Quality
15
Community
10
Popularity
7
Documentation
9
axum-response-cache
Maintenance
17
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
fopro
Maintenance
12
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
10

Technical Details

cached-pathaxum-response-cachefopro
Version0.10.10.5.02.0.3
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseApache-2.0MITApache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies221222
Crate Size83KB18KB26KB
Features630
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition201820212021
MSRV
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • axum-response-cache leads with a health score of 55/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • cached-path has the most downloads (1.4M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • cached-path is depended on by 230 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ fopro has not been updated in over a year.
  • cached-path, axum-response-cache are pre-1.0 — API may change.