rustio rustio.net

cached-path vs fopro vs axum-response-cache

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

cached-pathfoproaxum-response-cache
Health Score585150
Total Downloads1.3M9.3K109.7K
30d Downloads37.7K139.4K
Dependents14701
Releases24106
Last Updated23d ago530d ago238d ago
Age6y 2m1y 5m1y 5m

Health Breakdown

cached-path
Maintenance
17
Quality
15
Community
10
Popularity
7
Documentation
9
fopro
Maintenance
14
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
axum-response-cache
Maintenance
12
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
6
Documentation
10

Technical Details

cached-pathfoproaxum-response-cache
Version0.10.12.0.30.4.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MITMIT
Dependencies222212
Crate Size83KB26KB17KB
Features603
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition201820212021
MSRV
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • cached-path leads with a health score of 58/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • cached-path is depended on by 147 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ fopro has not been updated in over a year.
  • cached-path, axum-response-cache are pre-1.0 — API may change.