rustio rustio.net

cached-path vs fopro vs axum-response-cache

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

cached-pathfoproaxum-response-cache
Health Score545049
Total Downloads1.4M9.3K131.3K
30d Downloads25.5K07.2K
Dependents21401
Releases24106
Last Updated82d ago589d ago297d ago
Age6y 4m1y 7m1y 7m

Health Breakdown

cached-path
Maintenance
13
Quality
15
Community
10
Popularity
7
Documentation
9
fopro
Maintenance
13
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
axum-response-cache
Maintenance
11
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
6
Documentation
10

Technical Details

cached-pathfoproaxum-response-cache
Version0.10.12.0.30.4.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MITMIT
Dependencies222212
Crate Size83KB26KB17KB
Features603
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition201820212021
MSRV
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • cached-path leads with a health score of 54/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • cached-path is depended on by 214 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ fopro has not been updated in over a year.
  • cached-path, axum-response-cache are pre-1.0 — API may change.