Decision Workspace
cft vs turbomcp-cli vs hashguard
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
32
cft
growingv0.1.0
Command line tools for cloudformation stacks
60
turbomcp-cli
growingv3.0.10
Command-line tools for managing and testing MCP servers
57
hashguard
stablev5.0.0
Command-Line tool for ensuring the integrity of files using hash sums
Core Metrics
| cft | turbomcp-cli | hashguard | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 32 | 60 | 57 |
| Total Downloads | 1.8K | 8.9K | 25.5K |
| 30d Downloads | 4 | 194 | 40 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Releases | 1 | 69 | 29 |
| Last Updated | 1606d ago | 1d ago | 49d ago |
| Age | 4y 4m | 7m | 2y 7m |
Health Breakdown
cft
Maintenance
1
Quality
13
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
9
turbomcp-cli
Maintenance
19
Quality
18
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
12
hashguard
Maintenance
17
Quality
17
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| cft | turbomcp-cli | hashguard | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0 | 3.0.10 | 5.0.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 11 | 20 | 19 |
| Crate Size | 13KB | 64KB | 47KB |
| Features | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2018 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.89.0 | 1.85.0 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •turbomcp-cli leads with a health score of 60/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •hashguard has the most downloads (25.5K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ cft has not been updated in over a year.
- •cft is pre-1.0 — API may change.