rustio rustio.net

clipawl vs tokio-tungstenite-wasm vs rsbinder

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

clipawltokio-tungstenite-wasmrsbinder
Health Score465955
Total Downloads275546.8K46.1K
30d Downloads73180.9K1.9K
Dependents916022
Releases11321
Last Updated96d ago40d ago40d ago
Age3m4y 2m2y 2m

Health Breakdown

clipawl
Maintenance
8
Quality
14
Community
9
Popularity
3
Documentation
12
tokio-tungstenite-wasm
Maintenance
16
Quality
15
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
9
rsbinder
Maintenance
17
Quality
13
Community
7
Popularity
6
Documentation
12

Technical Details

clipawltokio-tungstenite-wasmrsbinder
Version0.2.10.8.20.6.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0non-standardApache-2.0
Dependencies13169
Crate Size17KB24KB95KB
Features3513
Yanked %0.0%0.0%14.3%
Edition202420182021
MSRV1.851.631.85
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • tokio-tungstenite-wasm leads with a health score of 59/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • tokio-tungstenite-wasm is depended on by 160 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.