rustio rustio.net

codebank vs ox_content_allocator vs ox_content_ast

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

codebankox_content_allocatorox_content_ast
Health Score526464
Total Downloads5.5K1.7K1.6K
30d Downloads000
Dependents7304252
Releases95252
Last Updated392d agotodaytoday
Age1y4m4m

Health Breakdown

codebank
Maintenance
14
Quality
13
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
ox_content_allocator
Maintenance
19
Quality
17
Community
12
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
ox_content_ast
Maintenance
19
Quality
17
Community
12
Popularity
4
Documentation
12

Technical Details

codebankox_content_allocatorox_content_ast
Version0.4.52.16.02.16.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✓ Yes
LicenseMITMITMIT
Dependencies1911
Crate Size140KB3KB5KB
Features300
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420212021
MSRV1.83.01.83.0
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • ox_content_allocator leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • codebank has the most downloads (5.5K), suggesting wider adoption.
  • ox_content_allocator is depended on by 304 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ codebank has not been updated in over a year.
  • codebank is pre-1.0 — API may change.