rustio rustio.net

commit_encoding_derive vs lombok-macros vs annotate

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

commit_encoding_derivelombok-macrosannotate
Health Score486767
Total Downloads138.3K64.7K356
30d Downloads3.9K1.5K0
Dependents272.5K2
Releases1510110
Last Updated368d ago2d ago14d ago
Age3y 2m1y 6m4m

Health Breakdown

commit_encoding_derive
Maintenance
7
Quality
14
Community
9
Popularity
6
Documentation
12
lombok-macros
Maintenance
19
Quality
18
Community
14
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
annotate
Maintenance
18
Quality
19
Community
12
Popularity
3
Documentation
15

Technical Details

commit_encoding_derivelombok-macrosannotate
Version0.12.02.0.311.2.5
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✓ Yes
LicenseApache-2.0MITMIT
Dependencies632
Crate Size9KB19KB10KB
Features004
Yanked %0.0%2.0%0.0%
Edition202120242024
MSRV1.81.01.91
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • lombok-macros leads with a health score of 67/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • commit_encoding_derive has the most downloads (138.3K), suggesting wider adoption.
  • lombok-macros is depended on by 2.5K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ commit_encoding_derive has not been updated in over a year.
  • commit_encoding_derive is pre-1.0 — API may change.