rustio rustio.net

concryptor vs aes-gcm-siv vs chacha20-blake3

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

concryptoraes-gcm-sivchacha20-blake3
Health Score456853
Total Downloads7219.2M258
30d Downloads01.8M0
Dependents01.8K19
Releases5253
Last Updated47d ago112d ago1d ago
Age2m6y 9m21d

Health Breakdown

concryptor
Maintenance
10
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
12
aes-gcm-siv
Maintenance
12
Quality
13
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
chacha20-blake3
Maintenance
14
Quality
15
Community
9
Popularity
3
Documentation
12

Technical Details

concryptoraes-gcm-sivchacha20-blake3
Version1.0.50.11.10.9.13
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✗ No✗ No
LicenseAGPL-3.0-or-laterMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT
Dependencies1584
Crate Size53KB27KB16KB
Features064
Yanked %0.0%8.0%0.0%
Edition202120212024
MSRV1.751.561.85
Owners12 (team)1

Quick Verdict

  • aes-gcm-siv leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • aes-gcm-siv is depended on by 1.8K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • aes-gcm-siv, chacha20-blake3 are pre-1.0 — API may change.