rustio rustio.net

continuous-testing vs stub-macro vs oxigdal-dev-tools

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

continuous-testingstub-macrooxigdal-dev-tools
Health Score485956
Total Downloads39.0K13.1K83
30d Downloads000
Dependents500
Releases30136
Last Updated854d ago2d ago4d ago
Age3y1y 10m3m

Health Breakdown

continuous-testing
Maintenance
7
Quality
18
Community
8
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
stub-macro
Maintenance
19
Quality
17
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
12
oxigdal-dev-tools
Maintenance
22
Quality
11
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15

Technical Details

continuous-testingstub-macrooxigdal-dev-tools
Version2.0.10.3.10.1.5
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✗ No✗ No
LicenseGPL-2.0-or-laterApache-2.0 OR MITApache-2.0
Dependencies2219
Crate Size1.8MB16KB38KB
Features030
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202120212024
MSRV1.85.01.85
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • stub-macro leads with a health score of 59/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • continuous-testing has the most downloads (39.0K), suggesting wider adoption.
  • ⚠ continuous-testing has not been updated in over a year.
  • stub-macro, oxigdal-dev-tools are pre-1.0 — API may change.