Decision Workspace
crunchert-storage vs pulsedb vs oxigdal-temporal
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
39
crunchert-storage
growingv0.1.2
Storage mechanism for the WIP CruncheRT timeseries DB.
38
pulsedb
experimentalv0.1.0
A high-performance time-series database written in Rust
56
oxigdal-temporal
experimentalv0.1.3
Multi-temporal raster analysis for OxiGDAL - Time series, change detection, phenology, and data cube operations
Core Metrics
| crunchert-storage | pulsedb | oxigdal-temporal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 39 | 38 | 56 |
| Total Downloads | 3.1K | 14 | 70 |
| 30d Downloads | 20 | 14 | 58 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Releases | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Last Updated | 523d ago | 24d ago | 6d ago |
| Age | 1y 5m | 24d | 1m |
Health Breakdown
crunchert-storage
Maintenance
6
Quality
13
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
pulsedb
Maintenance
11
Quality
11
Community
5
Popularity
1
Documentation
10
oxigdal-temporal
Maintenance
16
Quality
15
Community
8
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| crunchert-storage | pulsedb | oxigdal-temporal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.2 | 0.1.0 | 0.1.3 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 9 | 23 | 20 |
| Crate Size | 9KB | 83KB | 66KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | — | 1.85 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •oxigdal-temporal leads with a health score of 56/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •crunchert-storage has the most downloads (3.1K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ crunchert-storage has not been updated in over a year.