Decision Workspace
cu-embed vs cudaforge vs cudarc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
47
cu-embed
experimentalv0.1.1
Compile CUDA kernels with nvcc, embed cubin/PTX artifacts, and load the best module at runtime.
48
cudaforge
experimentalv0.1.5
Advanced CUDA kernel builder for Rust with incremental builds, auto-detection, and external dependency support.
70
cudarc
growingv0.19.4
Safe and minimal CUDA bindings
Core Metrics
| cu-embed | cudaforge | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 47 | 48 | 70 |
| Total Downloads | 29 | 5.6K | 3.1M |
| 30d Downloads | 29 | 3.1K | 919.7K |
| Dependents | 0 | 3 | 1.3K |
| Releases | 2 | 6 | 83 |
| Last Updated | 16d ago | 17d ago | 4d ago |
| Age | 17d | 1m | 3y 6m |
Health Breakdown
cu-embed
Maintenance
13
Quality
13
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
13
cudaforge
Maintenance
12
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
cudarc
Maintenance
19
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| cu-embed | cudaforge | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.1 | 0.1.5 | 0.19.4 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 6 | 11 | 5 |
| Crate Size | 19KB | 26KB | 654KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 45 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •cudarc leads with a health score of 70/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •cudarc is depended on by 1.3K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.