Decision Workspace
cufile vs cudarc vs baracuda-types
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
44
cufile
growingv0.2.0
Safe Rust bindings for NVIDIA CuFile library
68
cudarc
growingv0.19.8
Safe and minimal CUDA bindings
62
baracuda-types
experimentalv0.0.1-alpha.77
Shared type vocabulary for the baracuda CUDA stack (Half/BFloat16/Complex, DeviceRepr, CudaVersion, Feature, CudaStatus).
Core Metrics
| cufile | cudarc | baracuda-types | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 44 | 68 | 62 |
| Total Downloads | 981 | 5.9M | 9.3K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 517.9K | 2.6K |
| Dependents | 0 | 2.6K | 2.8K |
| Releases | 2 | 87 | 58 |
| Last Updated | 392d ago | 24d ago | 4d ago |
| Age | 1y 1m | 3y 10m | 2m |
Health Breakdown
cufile
Maintenance
6
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
cudarc
Maintenance
17
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
baracuda-types
Maintenance
14
Quality
16
Community
15
Popularity
5
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| cufile | cudarc | baracuda-types | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.2.0 | 0.19.8 | 0.0.1-alpha.77 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Crate Size | 10KB | 567KB | 17KB |
| Features | 0 | 68 | 6 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | — | 1.85 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •cudarc leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •baracuda-types is depended on by 2.8K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ cufile has not been updated in over a year.