rustio rustio.net

deadrop vs encryptable-tokio-fs vs rsa

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

deadropencryptable-tokio-fsrsa
Health Score424873
Total Downloads1042.5K135.2M
30d Downloads94711.0M
Dependents047.4K
Releases7863
Last Updated39d ago166d ago17d ago
Age1m6m7y 8m

Health Breakdown

deadrop
Maintenance
17
Quality
7
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
10
encryptable-tokio-fs
Maintenance
12
Quality
11
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
rsa
Maintenance
18
Quality
13
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15

Technical Details

deadropencryptable-tokio-fsrsa
Version0.2.10.1.70.9.10
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMITUnlicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies361626
Crate Size4.9MB26KB86KB
Features009
Yanked %0.0%0.0%1.6%
Edition202420212021
MSRV1.65
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • rsa leads with a health score of 73/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • rsa is depended on by 7.4K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.