Decision Workspace
ecpool vs fork_union vs tokio-rayon
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
48
ecpool
growingv1.0.2
Thread pool for managing executions of erasure coding
64
fork_union
stablev2.3.1
Low-latency OpenMP-style NUMA-aware cross-platform fine-grained parallelism library
58
tokio-rayon
growingv2.1.0
Mix async code with CPU-heavy thread pools using Tokio + Rayon
Core Metrics
| ecpool | fork_union | tokio-rayon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 48 | 64 | 58 |
| Total Downloads | 12.6K | 18.8K | 10.4M |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 571 | 290.1K |
| Dependents | 18 | 74 | 305 |
| Releases | 3 | 29 | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2831d ago | 113d ago | 1925d ago |
| Age | 7y 9m | 1y 1m | 5y 3m |
Health Breakdown
ecpool
Maintenance
3
Quality
19
Community
13
Popularity
5
Documentation
8
fork_union
Maintenance
13
Quality
20
Community
11
Popularity
5
Documentation
15
tokio-rayon
Maintenance
9
Quality
19
Community
13
Popularity
8
Documentation
9
Technical Details
| ecpool | fork_union | tokio-rayon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 1.0.2 | 2.3.1 | 2.1.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Dependencies | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Crate Size | 8KB | 98KB | 6KB |
| Features | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | — | 2021 | 2018 |
| MSRV | — | 1.64 | — |
| Owners | 2 (team) | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •fork_union leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •tokio-rayon has the most downloads (10.4M), suggesting wider adoption.
- •tokio-rayon is depended on by 305 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ ecpool, tokio-rayon have not been updated in over a year.