rustio rustio.net

ergonomic-windows vs winsafe vs ntapi

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

ergonomic-windowswinsafentapi
Health Score466361
Total Downloads2131.4M76.8M
30d Downloads43.0M5.2M
Dependents052903
Releases12715
Last Updated88d ago85d ago45d ago
Age2m6y 5m7y 6m

Health Breakdown

ergonomic-windows
Maintenance
8
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
winsafe
Maintenance
14
Quality
18
Community
11
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
ntapi
Maintenance
13
Quality
14
Community
14
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

ergonomic-windowswinsafentapi
Version0.1.00.0.270.4.3
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MITApache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies601
Crate Size91KB596KB127KB
Features3205
Yanked %0.0%0.0%6.7%
Edition202120242018
MSRV1.821.87
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • winsafe leads with a health score of 63/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • ntapi has the most downloads (76.8M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • ntapi is depended on by 903 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.