Decision Workspace
evo vs neat vs rsgenetic
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
31
evo
growingv0.0.1
Evolutionary Algorithm Library for Rust
47
neat
stablev1.0.2
Crate for working with NEAT in rust
46
rsgenetic
growingv1.8.1
A library providing genetic algorithm execution.
Core Metrics
| evo | neat | rsgenetic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 31 | 47 | 46 |
| Total Downloads | 3.1K | 10.7K | 159.0K |
| 30d Downloads | 5 | 36 | 137 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Releases | 1 | 11 | 52 |
| Last Updated | 3759d ago | 24d ago | 1891d ago |
| Age | 10y 5m | 8y 7m | 10y 3m |
Health Breakdown
evo
Maintenance
1
Quality
15
Community
3
Popularity
4
Documentation
8
neat
Maintenance
14
Quality
12
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
rsgenetic
Maintenance
6
Quality
20
Community
3
Popularity
6
Documentation
11
Technical Details
| evo | neat | rsgenetic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.0.1 | 1.0.2 | 1.8.1 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT/Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 3 | 10 | 2 |
| Crate Size | 8KB | 32KB | 20KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 27.3% | 0.0% |
| Edition | — | 2021 | — |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •neat leads with a health score of 47/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •rsgenetic has the most downloads (159.0K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ evo, rsgenetic have not been updated in over a year.
- •evo is pre-1.0 — API may change.