Decision Workspace
ezu-features vs geojson vs oxigdal-geojson
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
48
ezu-features
experimentalv0.3.0
GIS feature parsing (MVT, GeoJSON) for ezu
66
geojson
stablev1.0.0
Read and write GeoJSON vector geographic data
64
oxigdal-geojson
experimentalv0.1.5
GeoJSON (RFC 7946) driver for OxiGDAL - Pure Rust vector data processing with streaming support
Core Metrics
| ezu-features | geojson | oxigdal-geojson | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 48 | 66 | 64 |
| Total Downloads | 70 | 8.7M | 534 |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 549.9K | 0 |
| Dependents | 6 | 1.6K | 42 |
| Releases | 3 | 50 | 6 |
| Last Updated | today | 70d ago | 4d ago |
| Age | 3d | 11y 5m | 3m |
Health Breakdown
ezu-features
Maintenance
14
Quality
12
Community
8
Popularity
2
Documentation
12
geojson
Maintenance
14
Quality
14
Community
17
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
oxigdal-geojson
Maintenance
22
Quality
14
Community
10
Popularity
3
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| ezu-features | geojson | oxigdal-geojson | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.3.0 | 1.0.0 | 0.1.5 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT/Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Crate Size | 32KB | 189KB | 63KB |
| Features | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.89 | — | 1.85 |
| Owners | 1 | 4 (team) | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •geojson leads with a health score of 66/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •geojson is depended on by 1.6K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •ezu-features, oxigdal-geojson are pre-1.0 — API may change.