Decision Workspace
fast_fmt vs wfu vs fmt-utils
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
35
fast_fmt
growingv0.1.3
This crate provides faster, more flexible and more correct alternative to core::fmt
47
wfu
experimentalv0.0.3
worksoup's formatting utilities
35
fmt-utils
growingv0.1.0
Various utilities for use with std::fmt::Display and fast_fmt::Fmt
Core Metrics
| fast_fmt | wfu | fmt-utils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 35 | 47 | 35 |
| Total Downloads | 11.1K | 60 | 1.7K |
| 30d Downloads | 102 | 11 | 4 |
| Dependents | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Releases | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Last Updated | 3190d ago | 45d ago | 2056d ago |
| Age | 8y 10m | 1m | 5y 7m |
Health Breakdown
fast_fmt
Maintenance
2
Quality
11
Community
9
Popularity
5
Documentation
8
wfu
Maintenance
11
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
13
fmt-utils
Maintenance
1
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
9
Technical Details
| fast_fmt | wfu | fmt-utils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.3 | 0.0.3 | 0.1.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MITNFA | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Dependencies | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Crate Size | 6KB | 11KB | 5KB |
| Features | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | — | 2024 | 2018 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •wfu leads with a health score of 47/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •fast_fmt has the most downloads (11.1K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ fast_fmt, fmt-utils have not been updated in over a year.