Decision Workspace
file-crawler vs tokio-rayon vs tokio-fs
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
46
file-crawler
experimentalv0.1.5
A fast, concurrent, async and customisable file crawler
58
tokio-rayon
growingv2.1.0
Mix async code with CPU-heavy thread pools using Tokio + Rayon
55
tokio-fs
growingv0.1.7
Filesystem API for Tokio.
Core Metrics
| file-crawler | tokio-rayon | tokio-fs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 46 | 58 | 55 |
| Total Downloads | 1.7K | 7.7M | 13.0M |
| 30d Downloads | 10 | 1.5M | 225.4K |
| Dependents | 0 | 275 | 339 |
| Releases | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| Last Updated | 173d ago | 1817d ago | 2243d ago |
| Age | 6m | 4y 12m | 8y 1m |
Health Breakdown
file-crawler
Maintenance
11
Quality
16
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
tokio-rayon
Maintenance
9
Quality
19
Community
13
Popularity
8
Documentation
9
tokio-fs
Maintenance
5
Quality
13
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
Technical Details
| file-crawler | tokio-rayon | tokio-fs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.5 | 2.1.0 | 0.1.7 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Crate Size | 13KB | 6KB | 21KB |
| Features | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2018 | — |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tokio-rayon leads with a health score of 58/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •tokio-fs has the most downloads (13.0M), suggesting wider adoption.
- •tokio-fs is depended on by 339 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ tokio-rayon, tokio-fs have not been updated in over a year.
- •file-crawler, tokio-fs are pre-1.0 — API may change.