Decision Workspace
flow_compiler vs tidepool vs cranefack
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
38
flow_compiler
experimentalv0.1.0
JIT and AOT compiler for the Flow programming language using Cranelift
43
tidepool
experimentalv0.1.0
Compile Haskell effect stacks to Cranelift JIT, drive from Rust
41
cranefack
growingv0.4.2
An optimizing brainfuck compiler
Core Metrics
| flow_compiler | tidepool | cranefack | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 38 | 43 | 41 |
| Total Downloads | 22 | 30 | 8.6K |
| 30d Downloads | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Releases | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Last Updated | 99d ago | 17d ago | 1110d ago |
| Age | 3m | 1m | 4y 10m |
Health Breakdown
flow_compiler
Maintenance
8
Quality
12
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
10
tidepool
Maintenance
13
Quality
10
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
12
cranefack
Maintenance
5
Quality
14
Community
7
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| flow_compiler | tidepool | cranefack | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0 | 0.1.0 | 0.4.2 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 13 | 29 | 6 |
| Crate Size | 28KB | 61KB | 44KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | 1.83 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tidepool leads with a health score of 43/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •cranefack has the most downloads (8.6K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ cranefack has not been updated in over a year.