rustio rustio.net

fopro vs http-cache-semantics vs pingora

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

foprohttp-cache-semanticspingora
Health Score517268
Total Downloads9.3K3.2M5.0M
30d Downloads13308.6K730.4K
Dependents02.0K420
Releases101810
Last Updated530d ago51d ago25d ago
Age1y 5m6y 1m3y 3m

Health Breakdown

fopro
Maintenance
14
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
http-cache-semantics
Maintenance
13
Quality
16
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
pingora
Maintenance
17
Quality
16
Community
17
Popularity
8
Documentation
10

Technical Details

foprohttp-cache-semanticspingora
Version2.0.33.0.00.8.0
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseApache-2.0 OR MITBSD-2-ClauseApache-2.0
Dependencies22721
Crate Size26KB21KB40KB
Features0215
Yanked %0.0%22.2%0.0%
Edition202120242021
MSRV1.85
Owners12 (team)5

Quick Verdict

  • http-cache-semantics leads with a health score of 72/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • pingora has the most downloads (5.0M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • http-cache-semantics is depended on by 2.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ fopro has not been updated in over a year.
  • pingora is pre-1.0 — API may change.