rustio rustio.net

glifnames vs glyph-names vs swash

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

glifnamesglyph-namesswash
Health Score385266
Total Downloads1.6K367.1K5.7M
30d Downloads333.1K553.3K
Dependents027602
Releases1228
Last Updated1188d ago1144d agotoday
Age3y 3m6y4y 11m

Health Breakdown

glifnames
Maintenance
1
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
glyph-names
Maintenance
3
Quality
16
Community
14
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
swash
Maintenance
18
Quality
12
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
10

Technical Details

glifnamesglyph-namesswash
Version0.2.00.2.00.2.7
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-ClauseApache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies004
Crate Size131KB50KB238KB
Features005
Yanked %0.0%0.0%10.7%
Edition202120182021
MSRV
Owners12 (team)3

Quick Verdict

  • swash leads with a health score of 66/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • swash is depended on by 602 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ glifnames, glyph-names have not been updated in over a year.