rustio rustio.net

glyph-names vs glifnames vs swash

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

glyph-namesglifnamesswash
Health Score523866
Total Downloads367.1K1.6K5.7M
30d Downloads32.3K3537.6K
Dependents270602
Releases2128
Last Updated1144d ago1188d agotoday
Age6y3y 3m4y 11m

Health Breakdown

glyph-names
Maintenance
3
Quality
16
Community
14
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
glifnames
Maintenance
1
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
swash
Maintenance
18
Quality
12
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
10

Technical Details

glyph-namesglifnamesswash
Version0.2.00.2.00.2.7
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseApache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies004
Crate Size50KB131KB238KB
Features005
Yanked %0.0%0.0%10.7%
Edition201820212021
MSRV
Owners2 (team)13

Quick Verdict

  • swash leads with a health score of 66/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • swash is depended on by 602 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ glyph-names, glifnames have not been updated in over a year.