Decision Workspace
glyph-names vs glifnames vs swash
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
52
glyph-names
growingv0.2.0
Mapping of characters to glyph names according to the Adobe Glyph List Specification
38
glifnames
growingv0.2.0
Mapping of characters to glyph names according to the Adobe Glyph List Specification
64
swash
growingv0.2.9
Font introspection, complex text shaping and glyph rendering.
Core Metrics
| glyph-names | glifnames | swash | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 52 | 38 | 64 |
| Total Downloads | 714.8K | 1.6K | 9.4M |
| 30d Downloads | 94.2K | 0 | 847.3K |
| Dependents | 34 | 0 | 1.1K |
| Releases | 2 | 1 | 30 |
| Last Updated | 1252d ago | 1296d ago | 31d ago |
| Age | 6y 4m | 3y 6m | 5y 2m |
Health Breakdown
glyph-names
Maintenance
3
Quality
16
Community
14
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
glifnames
Maintenance
1
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
swash
Maintenance
16
Quality
12
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| glyph-names | glifnames | swash | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.2.0 | 0.2.0 | 0.2.9 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 OR MIT |
| Dependencies | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Crate Size | 50KB | 131KB | 238KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.3% |
| Edition | 2018 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 2 (team) | 1 | 3 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •swash leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •swash is depended on by 1.1K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ glyph-names, glifnames have not been updated in over a year.