Decision Workspace
glyphr vs titanf vs fontsdf
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
49
glyphr
growingv0.5.1
A no_std, lightweight and simple font rasterizing library
56
titanf
experimentalv2.5.1
Fast, safe, no_std font rasterizer written in pure Rust
50
fontsdf
growingv0.5.3
fontdue extension to generate sdf:s directly
Core Metrics
| glyphr | titanf | fontsdf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 49 | 56 | 50 |
| Total Downloads | 7.0K | 2.1K | 19.4K |
| 30d Downloads | 18 | 57 | 134 |
| Dependents | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Releases | 14 | 22 | 15 |
| Last Updated | 199d ago | 30d ago | 131d ago |
| Age | 1y | 5m | 3y 10m |
Health Breakdown
glyphr
Maintenance
11
Quality
17
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
titanf
Maintenance
17
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
fontsdf
Maintenance
12
Quality
13
Community
7
Popularity
5
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| glyphr | titanf | fontsdf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.5.1 | 2.5.1 | 0.5.3 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Crate Size | 20KB | 26KB | 158KB |
| Features | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 18.2% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •titanf leads with a health score of 56/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •fontsdf has the most downloads (19.4K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •glyphr, fontsdf are pre-1.0 — API may change.