rustio rustio.net

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise vs petgraph vs nopetgraph

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promisepetgraphnopetgraph
Health Score476640
Total Downloads1.4K323.5M5.3K
30d Downloads7025.9M20
Dependents516.0K0
Releases2783
Last Updated241d ago178d ago1862d ago
Age8m11y 2m5y 1m

Health Breakdown

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise
Maintenance
8
Quality
13
Community
7
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
petgraph
Maintenance
11
Quality
13
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
nopetgraph
Maintenance
4
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
12

Technical Details

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promisepetgraphnopetgraph
Version0.0.10.8.30.5.3
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT/Apache-2.0
Dependencies161610
Crate Size769KB808KB161KB
Features11129
Yanked %0.0%1.3%0.0%
Edition202120212018
MSRV1.641.64
Owners13 (team)1

Quick Verdict

  • petgraph leads with a health score of 66/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • petgraph is depended on by 16.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ nopetgraph has not been updated in over a year.