rustio rustio.net

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise vs petgraph vs nopetgraph

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promisepetgraphnopetgraph
Health Score466540
Total Downloads1.5K377.6M5.3K
30d Downloads031.2M0
Dependents517.7K0
Releases2783
Last Updated300d ago237d ago1922d ago
Age10m11y 4m5y 3m

Health Breakdown

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise
Maintenance
7
Quality
13
Community
7
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
petgraph
Maintenance
10
Quality
13
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
nopetgraph
Maintenance
4
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
12

Technical Details

grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promisepetgraphnopetgraph
Version0.0.10.8.30.5.3
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT/Apache-2.0
Dependencies161610
Crate Size769KB808KB161KB
Features11129
Yanked %0.0%1.3%0.0%
Edition202120212018
MSRV1.641.64
Owners13 (team)1

Quick Verdict

  • petgraph leads with a health score of 65/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • petgraph is depended on by 17.7K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ nopetgraph has not been updated in over a year.