rustio rustio.net

heapbuf vs smart_buffer vs linked_list_allocator

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

heapbufsmart_bufferlinked_list_allocator
Health Score414168
Total Downloads9.0K5.3K4.5M
30d Downloads00385.0K
Dependents00331
Releases5447
Last Updated553d ago1968d ago41d ago
Age2y5y 4m10y 3m

Health Breakdown

heapbuf
Maintenance
5
Quality
16
Community
5
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
smart_buffer
Maintenance
9
Quality
16
Community
3
Popularity
4
Documentation
9
linked_list_allocator
Maintenance
15
Quality
17
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13

Technical Details

heapbufsmart_bufferlinked_list_allocator
Version0.1.30.1.30.10.6
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0Apache-2.0/MIT
Dependencies701
Crate Size15KB6KB24KB
Features405
Yanked %0.0%0.0%4.3%
Edition20212018
MSRV1.61
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • linked_list_allocator leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • linked_list_allocator is depended on by 331 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ heapbuf, smart_buffer have not been updated in over a year.