rustio rustio.net

http-mitm-proxy vs http-cache-semantics vs pingora

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

http-mitm-proxyhttp-cache-semanticspingora
Health Score547268
Total Downloads28.1K3.2M5.0M
30d Downloads978319.3K762.8K
Dependents152.0K420
Releases201810
Last Updated62d ago51d ago25d ago
Age2y 4m6y 1m3y 3m

Health Breakdown

http-mitm-proxy
Maintenance
16
Quality
14
Community
9
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
http-cache-semantics
Maintenance
13
Quality
16
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
pingora
Maintenance
17
Quality
16
Community
17
Popularity
8
Documentation
10

Technical Details

http-mitm-proxyhttp-cache-semanticspingora
Version0.18.03.0.00.8.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMITBSD-2-ClauseApache-2.0
Dependencies22721
Crate Size34KB21KB40KB
Features3215
Yanked %0.0%22.2%0.0%
Edition202420242021
MSRV1.85
Owners12 (team)5

Quick Verdict

  • http-cache-semantics leads with a health score of 72/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • pingora has the most downloads (5.0M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • http-cache-semantics is depended on by 2.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • http-mitm-proxy, pingora are pre-1.0 — API may change.