Decision Workspace
iobuf vs zeropool vs zbin
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
50
iobuf
growingv5.8.1
A contiguous region of bytes, useful for I/O operations.
47
zeropool
experimentalv0.3.1
High-performance buffer pool with constant-time allocation, thread-safe operations, and 5x speedup over bytes crate
41
zbin
experimentalv0.1.5
Zero-copy binary trait for compio / compio 的零拷贝二进制 trait
Core Metrics
| iobuf | zeropool | zbin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 50 | 47 | 41 |
| Total Downloads | 262.8K | 1.1K | 118 |
| 30d Downloads | 81 | 28 | 26 |
| Dependents | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Releases | 78 | 6 | 5 |
| Last Updated | 3169d ago | 124d ago | 74d ago |
| Age | 11y 4m | 5m | 2m |
Health Breakdown
iobuf
Maintenance
7
Quality
21
Community
5
Popularity
6
Documentation
11
zeropool
Maintenance
13
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
zbin
Maintenance
9
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
2
Documentation
8
Technical Details
| iobuf | zeropool | zbin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 5.8.1 | 0.3.1 | 0.1.5 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MulanPSL-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 0 | 10 | 7 |
| Crate Size | 34KB | 46KB | 18KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | — | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •iobuf leads with a health score of 50/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •⚠ iobuf has not been updated in over a year.
- •zeropool, zbin are pre-1.0 — API may change.