Decision Workspace
jdb_fs vs reduct-base vs heed
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
44
jdb_fs
experimentalv0.2.1
High-performance log-structured file storage / 高性能日志结构文件存储
65
reduct-base
stablev1.19.0
Base crate for ReductStore
64
heed
growingv0.22.0
A fully typed LMDB (mdb.master) wrapper with minimum overhead
Core Metrics
| jdb_fs | reduct-base | heed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 44 | 65 | 64 |
| Total Downloads | 155 | 61.7K | 2.9M |
| 30d Downloads | 37 | 1.3K | 285.7K |
| Dependents | 2 | 90 | 505 |
| Releases | 4 | 60 | 51 |
| Last Updated | 74d ago | 30d ago | 31d ago |
| Age | 3m | 2y 7m | 6y 5m |
Health Breakdown
jdb_fs
Maintenance
14
Quality
12
Community
7
Popularity
3
Documentation
8
reduct-base
Maintenance
18
Quality
19
Community
10
Popularity
6
Documentation
12
heed
Maintenance
17
Quality
16
Community
13
Popularity
8
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| jdb_fs | reduct-base | heed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.2.1 | 1.19.0 | 0.22.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Dependencies | 17 | 14 | 14 |
| Crate Size | 35KB | 35KB | 75KB |
| Features | 1 | 4 | 21 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | 1.89.0 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •reduct-base leads with a health score of 65/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •heed has the most downloads (2.9M), suggesting wider adoption.
- •heed is depended on by 505 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •jdb_fs, heed are pre-1.0 — API may change.