Decision Workspace
leap-lang vs chumsky vs oak-ruby
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
41
leap-lang
growingv0.3.0
Leap language parser
64
chumsky
growingv0.12.0
A parser library for humans with powerful error recovery
62
oak-ruby
experimentalv0.0.10
Ruby dynamic programming language parser with support for object-oriented programming and modern Ruby features.
Core Metrics
| leap-lang | chumsky | oak-ruby | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 41 | 64 | 62 |
| Total Downloads | 8.5K | 14.4M | 365 |
| 30d Downloads | 23 | 2.7M | 74 |
| Dependents | 0 | 1.8K | 5 |
| Releases | 6 | 33 | 10 |
| Last Updated | 1347d ago | 102d ago | 4d ago |
| Age | 4y 9m | 4y 8m | 5m |
Health Breakdown
leap-lang
Maintenance
5
Quality
16
Community
5
Popularity
5
Documentation
10
chumsky
Maintenance
14
Quality
10
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
oak-ruby
Maintenance
19
Quality
15
Community
12
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| leap-lang | chumsky | oak-ruby | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.3.0 | 0.12.0 | 0.0.10 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 0 | 26 | 7 |
| Crate Size | 18KB | 193KB | 23KB |
| Features | 0 | 17 | 2 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 12.1% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.65 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 2 (team) | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •chumsky leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •chumsky is depended on by 1.8K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ leap-lang has not been updated in over a year.