rustio rustio.net

loom vs cache-padded vs crossbeam-epoch

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

loomcache-paddedcrossbeam-epoch
Health Score596260
Total Downloads44.3M24.8M410.7M
30d Downloads2.8M343.4K26.2M
Dependents2.4K245888
Releases40538
Last Updated703d ago1051d ago809d ago
Age7y 3m5y 10m8y 4m

Health Breakdown

loom
Maintenance
6
Quality
15
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
cache-padded
Maintenance
4
Quality
21
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
crossbeam-epoch
Maintenance
7
Quality
14
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

loomcache-paddedcrossbeam-epoch
Version0.7.21.3.00.9.18
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMITApache-2.0 OR MITMIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies903
Crate Size74KB9KB47KB
Features305
Yanked %0.0%0.0%18.4%
Edition201820182021
MSRV1.651.311.61
Owners2 (team)2 (team)4 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • cache-padded leads with a health score of 62/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • crossbeam-epoch has the most downloads (410.7M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • loom is depended on by 2.4K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ loom, cache-padded, crossbeam-epoch have not been updated in over a year.
  • loom, crossbeam-epoch are pre-1.0 — API may change.