Decision Workspace
mem_storage vs egui_memory_editor vs talc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
41
mem_storage
growingv0.1.1
Abstractions for readable and writable memory. Designed to be uesd in emulators.
52
egui_memory_editor
growingv0.2.14
A simple memory editor for the egui library
71
talc
stablev5.0.3
A fast and flexible allocator for no_std and WebAssembly
Core Metrics
| mem_storage | egui_memory_editor | talc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 41 | 52 | 71 |
| Total Downloads | 4.5K | 46.3K | 521.6K |
| 30d Downloads | 42 | 252 | 77.0K |
| Dependents | 6 | 0 | 128 |
| Releases | 2 | 20 | 27 |
| Last Updated | 2077d ago | 102d ago | 2d ago |
| Age | 5y 8m | 5y 1m | 2y 8m |
Health Breakdown
mem_storage
Maintenance
3
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
egui_memory_editor
Maintenance
14
Quality
17
Community
5
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
talc
Maintenance
19
Quality
21
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| mem_storage | egui_memory_editor | talc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.1 | 0.2.14 | 5.0.3 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| License | Zlib OR Apache-2.0 | MIT/Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Dependencies | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Crate Size | 8KB | 45KB | 66KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.7% |
| Edition | 2018 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | 1.64.0 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •talc leads with a health score of 71/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •talc is depended on by 128 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ mem_storage has not been updated in over a year.
- •mem_storage, egui_memory_editor are pre-1.0 — API may change.