rustio rustio.net

microslop vs unicode-segmentation vs unicode-width

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

microslopunicode-segmentationunicode-width
Health Score486964
Total Downloads237335.5M518.8M
30d Downloads1923.0M38.1M
Dependents012.0K20.5K
Releases172619
Last Updated52d ago1d ago172d ago
Age1m10y 11m10y 11m

Health Breakdown

microslop
Maintenance
16
Quality
14
Community
5
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
unicode-segmentation
Maintenance
17
Quality
17
Community
16
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
unicode-width
Maintenance
9
Quality
16
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

microslopunicode-segmentationunicode-width
Version0.3.91.13.20.2.2
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMITMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies132
Crate Size4KB112KB283KB
Features014
Yanked %0.0%7.7%0.0%
Edition202420182021
MSRV1.85.01.66
Owners165

Quick Verdict

  • unicode-segmentation leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • unicode-width has the most downloads (518.8M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • unicode-width is depended on by 20.5K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • microslop, unicode-width are pre-1.0 — API may change.