Decision Workspace
mismall vs s-zip vs rar-stream
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
45
mismall
experimentalv2.0.0
Streaming Huffman compression library with AES-256-GCM encryption and archive support
54
s-zip
experimentalv0.11.3
High-performance streaming ZIP library with AES-256 encryption and async/await support - Read/write ZIP files with minimal memory footprint. Supports password protection, cloud storage, and Tokio runtime.
52
rar-stream
experimentalv5.3.2
High-performance RAR streaming library with optional async, crypto, NAPI, and WASM support
Core Metrics
| mismall | s-zip | rar-stream | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 45 | 54 | 52 |
| Total Downloads | 16 | 1.2K | 2.2K |
| 30d Downloads | 3 | 436 | 1.4K |
| Dependents | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| Releases | 1 | 19 | 9 |
| Last Updated | 61d ago | 8d ago | 28d ago |
| Age | 2m | 3m | 1m |
Health Breakdown
mismall
Maintenance
9
Quality
17
Community
6
Popularity
1
Documentation
12
s-zip
Maintenance
18
Quality
13
Community
9
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
rar-stream
Maintenance
11
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| mismall | s-zip | rar-stream | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 2.0.0 | 0.11.3 | 5.3.2 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 13 | 22 | 16 |
| Crate Size | 110KB | 134KB | 230KB |
| Features | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | 1.85.0 | — | 1.85 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •s-zip leads with a health score of 54/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •rar-stream has the most downloads (2.2K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •s-zip is pre-1.0 — API may change.