rustio rustio.net

mit-lint vs git-conventional vs standard-commit

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

mit-lintgit-conventionalstandard-commit
Health Score556557
Total Downloads98.5K854.9K561
30d Downloads035.6K0
Dependents1.0K54771
Releases402524
Last Updated361d ago69d ago24d ago
Age4y 8m6y2m

Health Breakdown

mit-lint
Maintenance
8
Quality
18
Community
13
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
git-conventional
Maintenance
15
Quality
16
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
15
standard-commit
Maintenance
11
Quality
14
Community
16
Popularity
3
Documentation
13

Technical Details

mit-lintgit-conventionalstandard-commit
Version3.4.01.1.00.11.12
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseCC0-1.0MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT
Dependencies1352
Crate Size55KB17KB9KB
Features000
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420242024
MSRV1.85
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • git-conventional leads with a health score of 65/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • mit-lint is depended on by 1.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • standard-commit is pre-1.0 — API may change.