rustio rustio.net

moka vs scc vs quick_cache

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

mokasccquick_cache
Health Score616969
Total Downloads97.9M74.7M21.2M
30d Downloads6.0M3.3M1.5M
Dependents10.9K1.6K2.4K
Releases6725041
Last Updated114d ago7d ago16d ago
Age5y 8m5y 7m3y 11m

Health Breakdown

moka
Maintenance
13
Quality
11
Community
14
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
scc
Maintenance
19
Quality
12
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
quick_cache
Maintenance
18
Quality
16
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

mokasccquick_cache
Version0.12.153.8.40.7.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
License(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Apache-2.0Apache-2.0MIT
Dependencies251210
Crate Size240KB142KB66KB
Features715
Yanked %6.0%80.0%0.0%
Edition202120242021
MSRV1.71.11.85.01.85
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • scc leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • moka has the most downloads (97.9M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • moka is depended on by 10.9K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • moka, quick_cache are pre-1.0 — API may change.