rustio rustio.net

moka vs scc vs quick_cache

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

mokasccquick_cache
Health Score676868
Total Downloads67.1M53.8M14.3M
30d Downloads7.3M6.1M1.9M
Dependents7.3K1.1K2.0K
Releases6724137
Last Updated6d ago3d ago8d ago
Age5y 5m5y 4m3y 7m

Health Breakdown

moka
Maintenance
19
Quality
11
Community
14
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
scc
Maintenance
19
Quality
12
Community
14
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
quick_cache
Maintenance
18
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

mokasccquick_cache
Version0.12.153.6.120.6.21
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
License(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Apache-2.0Apache-2.0MIT
Dependencies251210
Crate Size240KB140KB60KB
Features714
Yanked %6.0%83.0%0.0%
Edition202120242021
MSRV1.71.11.85.01.71
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • scc leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • moka has the most downloads (67.1M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • moka is depended on by 7.3K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • moka, quick_cache are pre-1.0 — API may change.