rustio rustio.net

moving_gc_arena vs petgraph vs grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

moving_gc_arenapetgraphgrabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise
Health Score436647
Total Downloads16.8K323.5M1.4K
30d Downloads1725.9M70
Dependents016.0K5
Releases14782
Last Updated60d ago178d ago241d ago
Age6y 2m11y 2m8m

Health Breakdown

moving_gc_arena
Maintenance
12
Quality
11
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
petgraph
Maintenance
11
Quality
13
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
grabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise
Maintenance
8
Quality
13
Community
7
Popularity
4
Documentation
15

Technical Details

moving_gc_arenapetgraphgrabapl_temp_petgraph_crate_not_namesquatting_i_promise
Version0.4.00.8.30.0.1
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies11616
Crate Size27KB808KB769KB
Features11211
Yanked %28.6%1.3%0.0%
Edition201820212021
MSRV1.641.64
Owners13 (team)1

Quick Verdict

  • petgraph leads with a health score of 66/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • petgraph is depended on by 16.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.